Seminar. Leadership and ethics in healthcare

Слайд 2

ASSIGNED WORK PARTICIPATE IN SEMINAR OR, COMPLETE OPTION 2 READ ASSIGNED

ASSIGNED WORK

PARTICIPATE IN SEMINAR
OR, COMPLETE OPTION 2
READ ASSIGNED ARTICLES
POST DISCUSSION BOARD

ENTRY
RESPOND TO TWO PEERS’, OR MY, POSTS
COMPLETE UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT ON ETHICIST
POINTERS ON NEXT TWO SLIDES
Слайд 3

ASSIGNMENT POINTERS ORAL PRESENTATION MAY BE AUDIO OR VIDEO 3-MINUTE MAXIMUM

ASSIGNMENT POINTERS

ORAL PRESENTATION
MAY BE AUDIO OR VIDEO
3-MINUTE MAXIMUM
FOLLOW THE RUBRIC
NEXT SLIDE
PROFESSIONAL

PRESENTATION
Слайд 4

RUBRIC PROVIDE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF YOUR SELECTED THEORIST. /20 INCLUDE

RUBRIC

PROVIDE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF YOUR SELECTED THEORIST. /20
INCLUDE DETAILS OF

THEIR THEORY. /20
DEMONSTRATE SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FIELD OF HEALTHCARE. /20
SHOW HOW YOUR SELECTED THEORY/THEORIST MAY CONTRIBUTE TO CURRENT ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN HEALTHCARE. GIVE AT LEAST ONE EXAMPLE. /20
OFFER AT LEAST THREE CREDIBLE AND SCHOLARLY REFERENCES TO SUPPORT YOUR ASSERTIONS. /20
Слайд 5

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC St. THOMAS AQUINAS (1225-1274)

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC

St. THOMAS AQUINAS (1225-1274)

THEORY OF

NATURAL LAW
GOD CREATED THE WORLD RATIONALLY
HUMANS SHOULD STRIVE FOR THE HIGHEST GOOD
SEEK WISDOM AND KNOW GOD
GOOD PRESERVES LIFE AND THE HUMAN RACE
ACT PRUDENTLY TO LIVE IN COMMUNITY AND SEEK THE TRUTH
LISTEN TO OUR CONSCIENCE
HUMANS CAN THINK/REASON AND HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO CHOOSE GOOD OVER EVIL
Слайд 6

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804) THEORY

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC

IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804)

THEORY OF DEONTOLOGY
DUTY-BASED

ETHICS
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE HELPS MAKE DECISIONS
EVERYTHING IN SOCIETY HAS RELATIVE VALUE
THE ONLY TRUE GOOD IS GOOD WILL
ALL HUMAN BEINGS HAVE WORTH
PEOPLE ARE NOT JUST TOOLS TO ACHIEVE SOCIETAL OR ORGANIZATION GOALS
Слайд 7

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873)

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC

JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873)

THEORY OF

CONSEQUENTIALISM
CHOICES BASED ON CONSEQUENCES OF ACTION
ACTIONS AFFECT DECISIONS IN FAVOR OF ALL PEOPLE
UTILITARIANISM IMPACTS POLICY DEVELOPMENT
ACT UTILITY - EACH DECISION BASED ON ITS OWN MERIT
RULE UTILITY - CONSEQUENCES HELP TO FORM RULES
RULES ARE THEN USED FOR DECISIONS
INFLUENTIAL IN AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ETHICS !!
Слайд 8

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC JOHN RAWLS (1921-2002) BASIS

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC

JOHN RAWLS (1921-2002)

BASIS FOR SOCIAL

JUSTICE (below)
HYPOTHETICAL CONCEPTS: ORIGINAL POSITION AND VEIL OF IGNORANCE
IF TRUE, WE WOULD CREATE RULES TO LIVE IN A JUST SOCIETY
THESE RULES WOULD LEAD TO A SOCIAL CONTRACT
SOCIAL CONTRACT INCLUDES EQUAL BASIC RIGHTS
PROTECT THOSE IN LESSER POSITIONS (IN YOUR SELF INTEREST)
THE ADVANTAGED HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY (DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE)
SOCIAL JUSTICE (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH “DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE”)
PUBLIC HEALTH AND COMMUNITY AGENCIES
AMERICA IS JUDGED BY HOW IT TREATS THE LEAST WELL OFF
Слайд 9

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE HOW SOCIETY DECIDES: WHO GETS WHAT (WHICH DIAGNOSES?) HOW

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE

HOW SOCIETY DECIDES:
WHO GETS WHAT (WHICH DIAGNOSES?)
HOW THEY WILL PAY

(ALL FOR FREE?)
WHO WILL PAY IF THEY CANNOT (HOW DECIDED?)
HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT EVERYONE IS TREATED FAIRLY
CONCERNED WITH WHAT IS FAIR OR PERCEIVED TO BE FAIR
PATIENTS EXPECT FAIR, QUICK TREATMENT THAT MEETS THEIR NEEDS
Слайд 10

ARISTOTLE (384-322 BCE) THEORY OF VIRTUE TO BE ETHICAL, ALLOW OTHERS

ARISTOTLE (384-322 BCE)

THEORY OF VIRTUE
TO BE ETHICAL, ALLOW OTHERS TO GAIN

THEIR BEST HUMAN POTENTIAL
PRACTICE THE CARDINAL VIRTUES (PRUDENCE, TEMPERANCE, COURAGE, JUSTICE) BY BEING MORAL
HAPPINESS IS NOT IN:
PURSUING OUR PASSIONATE APPETITES SUCH AS EATING, DRINKING, POWER
WE ARE TO USE TEMPERANCE IN THESE THINGS, SO THAT WE CAN ENJOY THEM WITHOUT BEING RULED BY THEM
Слайд 11

MARTIN BUBER (1878-1965) HIERARCHY OF RELATIONSHIPS HOW PEOPLE INTERACT WITH EACH

MARTIN BUBER (1878-1965)

HIERARCHY OF RELATIONSHIPS
HOW PEOPLE INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER
LEVELS
I-I (CHILD)
I-IT

(LABEL)
I-YOU (EACH DIFFERENT W/ VALUE)
I-THOU (INDIVIDUALS W/ VALUE)
Слайд 12

LAWRENCE KOHLBERG (1927-1987) THEORY OF MORAL REASONING KEY TO DEVELOPMENT AND

LAWRENCE KOHLBERG (1927-1987)

THEORY OF MORAL REASONING
KEY TO DEVELOPMENT AND UNDERSTANDING OF

DECISIONS PEOPLE MAKE
LEVELS:
I – PRE-MORAL (AVOID PUNISHMENT)
II – PRE-CONVENTIONAL (“WHAT’S IN IT FOR ME?”)
III – CONVENTIONAL (“GOOD” PERSON)
IV – LAW & ORDER (HCAs)
V AND VI – PRINCIPLED MORAL REASONING (UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES)